How the United States underdeveloped AppalachiaAppalachia--among the most storied and yet least understood regions in America--has long been associated with poverty and backwardness. But how did this image arise and what exactly does it mean? In Ramp Hollow, Steven Stoll launches an original investigation into the history of Appalachia and its place in U.S. history, with a special emphasis on how generations of its inhabitants lived, worked, survived, and depended on natural resources held in common.Ramp Hollow traces the rise of the Appalachian homestead and how its self-sufficiency resisted dependence on money and the industrial society arising elsewhere in the United States--until, beginning in the nineteenth century, extractive industries kicked off a "scramble for Appalachia" that left struggling homesteaders dispossessed of their land. As the men disappeared into coal mines and timber camps, and their families moved into shantytowns or deeper into the mountains, the commons of Appalachia were, in effect, enclosed, and the fate of the region was sealed.Ramp Hollow takes a provocative look at Appalachia, and the workings of dispossession around the world, by upending our notions about progress and development. Stoll ranges widely from literature to history to economics in order to expose a devastating process whose repercussions we still feel today.
"Often cited as an example of poverty and societal dysfunction, as in J. D. Vance's Hillbilly Elegy (2016), Appalachia, for Stoll (The Great Delusion, 2008), has also meant resistance and freedom from centralized government for the people who, since the nation's earliest days, sought sanctuary in its rugged uplands. Forests and the meadowed hollows between mountains provided basic sustenance for cabin-building, cattle-grazing, bear-hunting households, and locally made whiskey had better exchange value than currency from far-off banks. But homesteaders could not long evade the growing nation's appetite for coal, timber, and tax revenue. Maps drawn to guide Civil War armies were repurposed by industrialists seeking land they could excavate or clear-cut. Subsistence farming gave way to subsistence wages in mines and factories and dependency on the very industries that had pushed settlers off their land. To truly understand Appalachian poverty, suggests Stoll, we must start with this large-scale dispossession. Offering a vast contextual woodland in which to explore life in this storied region, Stoll has created a feisty critique of capitalist land use and a rambling and provocative history.--Driscoll, Brendan Copyright 2017 Booklist"
From Booklist, Copyright (c) American Library Association. Used with permission.
Publisher's Weekly Review:
"Reviewed by Sarah Jones Appalachia is many things, depending on whom you ask. Observers have at various points christened it the other America, the land outside time, and, more recently, Trump country. But for many of us, it is simply home, and we don't recognize much of it from its media portrayals. We know it as an uneasy and lovely place, shaped by addiction and ecological degradation and a history of open class war. But these complications rarely make it into media coverage. Appalachia seems to matter little to outsiders unless it is an election year or time for one of Remote Area Medical's free clinics, when photographers and journalists who otherwise never step foot in the area swarm to document the spectacle of its poverty. J.D. Vance's popular Hillbilly Elegy only reinforced this image of Appalachia as a dysfunctional place, doomed by its own bloody intransigence. But poverty is not a cultural problem, in Appalachia and elsewhere. It is a problem of power, defined by who has it and who does not. Stoll (The Great Delusion), a professor of history at Fordham University, examines this issue exhaustively, fixing a genealogy of Appalachian poverty that places the problem in its proper political and historical context. Stoll identifies it, correctly, as a consequence of dispossession. By giving it a distinct pedigree, he helps readers understand why Appalachia became poor and why it has stayed that way for so long. "The way back to Appalachia leads through the history of capitalism in Great Britain," Stoll writes. Capitalism is the specter haunting Appalachia. Stoll focuses specifically on the practice of enclosure, employed first by England's feudal lords to establish the concept of private property. Victorian England's moralists favored the practice and, later, so did American tycoons and corporations, who used it to gain access to Appalachia's natural resources. The region's coal and timber made it valuable. Now the free market is moving on, leaving an exsanguinated corpse behind. Stoll is not the first academic to attribute Appalachian poverty to the influence of external forces. But his work is distinct in its emphasis on the practice of enclosure and his decision to connect Appalachia's dispossession to the material dispossessions whites inflicted on freed slaves and that empires and transnational conglomerates later inflicted on colonial and postcolonial nations. Though Appalachia's "development" lacks the racialized aspect present in the latter two examples, a thread connects each: the idea that capitalism is a civilizing force. Stoll's is an academic work, but that should not deter readers. He is an appealing writer. The book's most significant flaw occurs late in its final third, when he veers sharply from analysis to commentary. Even so, it is a minor issue. Stoll's insights on how Appalachia became what it is today are an important corrective to flawed commentary about a much-maligned place. (Nov.) Sarah Jones is a staff writer for the New Republic, where she covers politics and culture. © Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved."
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved